Newsonomics: Tribune Publishing Wraps Its Arms Around San Diego — and All of Southern California
Update: Sales announcement at $85 million here
Southern California, poking northward into Santa Barbara and stretching southward to the Mexican border, will soon become Tribune Territory.
In a deal intended to be soon announced, Tribune Publishing will buy UT San Diego (the former San Diego Union Tribune) for about $80 million — and the assumption of growing pension obligations, recently upped to more than $100 million, I’ve learned through several confidential sources. Though imminent, it is still possible that a final hiccup would delay a signed deal, as has previously happened in these negotiations.
Tribune Publishing refused comment on the transaction, saying only “it doesn’t comment on rumor or speculation.” Calls to the UT San Diego were not returned.
After closing, it is likely that the Los Angeles Times will operate the San Diego business, similar to what Tribune has done in Baltimore and Chicago. In those cities, the Sun and Tribune run the company’s local publishing acquisitions.
The sale – which I first outlined (“Tribune in final bidding for UT San Diego”) two months ago — will conclude an on-again, off-again auction. The sales process first started by developer and UT San Diego owner Doug Manchester last summer, has involved three sparring parties, the other two local.
The price compares to the $110 million that Manchester paid in 2011 to Platinum Equity — which had itself bought the company in a bottom-of-the-recession fire sale for about $35 million in 2009 from its longtime owner, the Copley family. In that transaction, Manchester also bought U-T related real estate — which is keeping as he sells the newspaper assets. That real estate may be worth $40 million or more, so he ends up ahead on his U-T deal, in addition to profits he took over the years of his ownership.
The buy would add the region’s No. 3 paper by print circulation to the Los Angeles Times, which despite many cutbacks over the years still dominates the print news scene in greater L.A. The Times can still claim a print circulation of 628,910 daily and 944,795 Sunday; U-T San Diego claims 268,038 on Sunday and 183,456 daily. (The Orange County Register counts itself barely ahead of U-T San Diego, at 302,802 Sunday and 192,567 daily. All counts are from the Alliance for Audited Media.) Of course, it’s the massive (but uneven) digital footprint of both the Times and the U-T that will matter most going forward.
- What will it mean for San Diego’s citizens, readers, and advertisers — making up California’s second-largest city, the 17th largest in the country — to be served more and more by a single company? It’s hard to consider any print-based company a monopoly these days, but the outsized power of one company editorially should be the subject of concern and debate. U-T editor Jeff Light has done an admirable job of holding together a newsroom and a product under challenging owners, budgets, and policies over five years.Further, San Diego’s civic community has never liked the shadow thrown on it by bigger Los Angeles. What will local mean as the Tribune/Times takes control of the property? We can expect that the U-T will maintain the brand – and that the Times will then consolidate all business and editorial efficiencies possible.Tribune outlasted two San Diego-based would-be buyers. Radio exec and sometime Manchester associate John Lynch, whose duties were diminished more than a year ago, has worked since last summer to put together a deal. He told me his last period of negotiating “exclusivity” ended 10 days ago. Lynch had been working to cajole various monied partners to buy out Manchester for awhile.Businessman and philanthropist Malin Burnham had worked tirelessly to put together a civic nonprofit. He aimed at running a daily operation deeply tied to community, but couldn’t raise sufficient money to convince Doug Manchester to keep the paper locally owned. Burnham’s group wanted a keep-it-in-San Diego discount; it made its final offer to Manchester on Monday morning.
What will it mean for Tribune Publishing? Just Wednesday, TPUB released its Q1 numbers, and they were meager. Meager as in $3 million in net profit — a margin of just 0.6 percent — for the quarter, as overall revenues dropped 4.9 percent. TPUB, with its eight metro papers, ranks among the top four U.S. newspaper companies by size. That close-to-the-bone financial performance displays how dicey the newspaper business has gotten these days. On Wednesday, TPUB share prices dropped another 2.4 percent to $16. That’s down 36 percent from its initial share price, as Tribune’s publishing operations split off from its broadcast and digital assets last August.Even with U-T San Diego’s profitability, investors are bound to look askance at a ninth metro newspaper asset. Griffin’s five-point turnaround plan, which he discussed on the first-quarter call (here via Seeking Alpha), makes good sense. The question for him, as for the heads of all publicly owned, market-sensitive newspaper companies, is: Will they be given enough time and money to make digital transformation strategies successful?
What will it mean for innovation in product and business model for U.S. and global newspapers generally? It is way too early to assess Austin Beutner’s tenure in L.A., after a scant nine months. But in that time, Beutner has aggressively begun to change the community and executive profiles of the Times. He’s shaken it up, gone younger and more digitally savvy than previous publishers. He believes that community better offers a route forward to rebuilding local news organizations in the digital age we’re moving into. He knows reinvestment in product — the kind of reinvestment we’ve lately seen under private owners at The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, and the Star Tribune — is needed, though where the resources may come from is a big, open question.In short, Beutner, who comes from a private equity background rather than a publishing one, could be part of a new wave of modern media thinking much needed by regional press worldwide. The joker in the deck: How might this sale lead to a down-the-road Beutner-led private buyout of the Times/U-T business?
- What do the UT’s pension obligations tell us about an often-unspoken drag on legacy news company transformation?Tribune Publishing found itself on the brink of an agreement with Doug Manchester two months ago (after a near try last summer), but the deal hung up because to pensions.An annual PWC pension fund audit slowed the deal. Pension obligations swelled from about $50 million to about $111 million. While those obligations don’t represent money immediately owed, they present more of an issue for a public company’s books than for a private one. Why did the obligations grow? Two reasons: lackluster investment results and the faster-growing longevity of pensioners.In its final offer, TPUB has been able to reduce its cash price, down about $10 million from its pre-audit March offer, in part because of the greater pension obligations.In many newspaper sales, pension obligations contribute to the difficulty of valuation and sale — and then, of course, make operating budgets more challenging as print advertising continues its deep slide.
In the end, we come back to a truism about Doug Manchester’s three-and-a-half year ownership of the U-T. Ink doesn’t flow through Manchester’s veins; real estate does, and the Fairmont hotel he is building in Austin appears to trump the UT for his enthusiasm. After taking off much of six weeks to cruise around the Bahamas and other locales after his March deal was delayed, associates say Manchester returned newly prepared to make a sale.
Finally, there’s the political angle. “Papa Doug” Manchester and his associate John Lynch define themselves by their conservatism, an important strand of San Diego culture.
Beutner’s L.A. Times, though, is proving itself out to be a liberal force in L.A., and he would presumably bring that perspective to San Diego. The days of by-the-old-book, down-the-middle objective journalism are clearly numbered overall, with Southern California now a prime case history in the reinvention of the local news business.